LiteLLM
LiteLLM's architecture is library-first: a Python package plus an optional proxy server you operate yourself. Routing, fallbacks and budgeting run in your infrastructure.
Comparison
How Privian compares to LiteLLM for privacy-first LLM routing, prompt-level data protection and sensitive-data masking.
Quick summary
Choose Privian if you want a hosted, privacy-first LLM gateway that masks supported personal and sensitive data before prompts reach the model.
Choose LiteLLM if you want an open-source proxy and provider abstraction layer that normalises many model APIs into one interface.
Choose Privian if you want a hosted, privacy-first LLM gateway that masks supported personal and sensitive data before prompts reach the model.
Definitions
Comparison
Grounded in publicly available product positioning. Where we are not confident, we say so.
| Capability | LiteLLM | Privian |
|---|---|---|
| Primary positioning | Open-source LLM proxy and provider abstraction layer | Privacy-first LLM gateway with prompt-level data protection |
| Privacy-first routing | Not a stated focus | Yes, core design goal |
| PII masking | Not a stated focus | Yes — supported personal/secret entities masked before provider call |
| Prompt-level data protection | Not a stated focus | Yes — deterministic placeholders, rehydrated in the response |
| BYOK | See vendor docs | Yes — provider keys stored AES-GCM, decrypted in-process |
| Gateway model | Self-hosted proxy or library | Hosted gateway with a small JSON contract |
| Prompt injection protection | Not a stated focus | No claim |
| Tool / function calling | Yes, where the underlying provider supports it | Not currently supported |
| Native streaming | Yes, where the underlying provider supports it | Not currently supported (artificial chunking only) |
| Open source | Yes (MIT) | Closed source (beta) |
| Observability | See vendor docs | Structural counters only; raw prompts never persisted |
| Pricing model | See vendor pricing | Usage-based plans, see /pricing |
| Enterprise orientation | See vendor docs | Designed for privacy-sensitive teams; HIPAA/SOC 2/PCI not claimed |
| Best fit | Teams that want self-hosted provider abstraction | Teams that need supported PII masking and provider-agnostic BYOK routing |
Architecture
LiteLLM's architecture is library-first: a Python package plus an optional proxy server you operate yourself. Routing, fallbacks and budgeting run in your infrastructure.
Privian sits between your application and the model provider. Each request runs through detection → masking → BYOK provider call → rehydration in a single in-memory pass. The data plane is designed around minimising what reaches the provider rather than around routing breadth or orchestration.
Privacy & security
When to choose
When to choose
Framework
Assess LiteLLM
Choose LiteLLM if you want an open-source proxy and provider abstraction layer that normalises many model APIs into one interface.
Assess Privian
Choose Privian if you want a hosted, privacy-first LLM gateway that masks supported personal and sensitive data before prompts reach the model.
Validate scope
Confirm required capabilities and current limitations against the evaluation criteria.
Transparency
Privian is in active development. Listing what it does not do today is part of how we earn trust — expect this list to shrink over time.
FAQ
Related
Plans & pricing
BYOK, zero retention, prompt-level masking. Pricing is published transparently; Privian is in beta and limits may change.